Komentáre k ActionScript3 for Flash 8ball

Od: Bryngfors.com » Blog Archive » Ingen vila, ingen ro

Bryngfors.com » Blog Archive » Ingen vila, ingen ro — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:13:42 +0000

[...] Så här i efterhand så kan man faktiskt se att det har funnits ganska många tecken på en ny Flashspelare. En anställd hos Macromedia postade information om Flash och E4X på fel mailinglista och när Flash 8 förhandsvisades stod det Actionscript 3 i property panelen, något som avfärdades som en bugg. [...]

Od: Franto.com Flash blog » I was right. ActionScript 3.0 is here

Franto.com Flash blog » I was right. ActionScript 3.0 is here — Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:41:35 +0000

[...] There were some rumours about ActionScript 3.0 for Flash player 8 long time ago (check my post) and today there is new information about Actionscript 3.0, but for Flex users. I’m not Flex developer so do not know more, but it is just information from Flashcoders mailinglist. Quotations from Macromedia Developer Center: [...]

Od: FlashBlog » ActionScript 3?

FlashBlog » ActionScript 3? — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:38:35 +0000

[...] tedo en Noticias por Japerman el Lunes, 30 Mayo 2005 Referencia a: WebIntenta, via:Franto.com Ser? posible que cuando todav?a nos estabamos acostumbrando al Actions [...]

Od: Alex Schleifer

Alex Schleifer — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:57:49 +0000

I spotted that graph on their Flash Framework whitepaper. Kevin Lynch commented to clarify things and it seems to be have been a misprint of sorts. We’re still on for late summer, which could also mean September.

More here.

Od: some1else

some1else — Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:17:08 +0000

I think that setting is probably just a simple way to extend the _root MovieClip class principally in the same way you would extend it with defining a “Linkage -> AS 2.0 Class” to a MovieClip Symbol in the IDE.

Od: Tony MacDonell

Tony MacDonell — Mon, 30 May 2005 14:48:08 +0000

hmm a Document Class… I would guess that this would represent more of a standardized way to structure your work. Document is maybe not the best idea for it as the Flash Player’s DOM is already fully represented.

Maybe it will be more of an Application class. Something that will recieve all of the proper start up events and the like. Flash could really benefit from that, as many different people have many different ways to structure their work.

Od: Ian

Ian — Mon, 30 May 2005 13:13:20 +0000

My interest is peaked by that comment as well. One would deduct from that image that we will soon be able to have a class that exists as root (been crossing my fingers), maybe we will be extending ‘Stage’?

Od: Administrator

Administrator — Sun, 29 May 2005 19:23:32 +0000

what do you mean by “oes this mean each movie will have a “code behind”??”

almost every movie has code behind byt maybe i dont understand, what you wanted to say.

Od: Keith

Keith — Sun, 29 May 2005 18:47:17 +0000

Whats possibly more interesting is that box just below that says “Document class” – does this mean each movie will have a “code behind”??

Od: scott janousek

scott janousek — Sat, 28 May 2005 23:30:38 +0000

Everyone chill.

It will be out … when it’s out … lest we have another “Updater 2″ on our hands.